Conflict Management Your Preferred Conflict Management Style - 1100 Words

Conflict Management: Your Preferred Conflict Management Style (Coursework Sample) Content: Your Preferred Conflict Management StyleIn my opinion, every person has his or her conflict management style. Besides, the environment that one is it may affect a person's decision as far as conflict management is concerned. According to the assessment, my preferred conflict management style is compromising and avoiding. Other assessment results such as competing and accommodating do not reflect my character. When engaged in a conflict, I prefer to sacrifice something to temporarily end arguments, which can later result in more damages than what was expected. Besides, I do try to accommodate other party and listen to how they argue their points. Based on the opposite party ideas and points, I conclude whether to compromise or avoid the confrontation. If the conflict cannot yield any results or lead to a solution, I always avoid it.It is essential to point out that conflict occurs when two parties disagree due to threats to their interests, concerns, and needs (Griffin et al. 374). Besides, it can be beneficial or destructive in an organization. The approach or style used to solve conflict matters a lot in any organization. Personal behaviors can cause a dysfunctional conflict, which cannot be easily solved by any conflict management style discussed in the assessment. Besides, such form of conflict can lead to retaliation or fights between parties. If this form of conflict is no solved, it can adversely affect the employees' morale, cause depression, or lead to absenteeism in the workplace. Conflict can be sometimes positive and result in innovations or solutions to certain problems. Therefore, not all conflicts that one need to employ the conflict management styles.Every person has his or her negotiation style. Besides, the environment or a situation that one is facing may also play a significant role in determining the negotiation style. In my opinion, I have a different view of the negotiation styles. Time is one of the most significant factor s that affect my negotiation style. Besides, I have a high sense of urgency around time and am always time sensitive. I also have a win-loss attitude where I either loss or the other party that is negotiating. Besides, when it comes to formality, my style is informal.In a person's lifetime, one has to negotiate either formally or informally (Griffin et al. 396). It is vital to point out that when two parties engage in a conflict, the best way to solve their differences is through negotiations. Besides, when negotiating, time, formality, agreement form, mode of communication and team organization needs to be considered. Some people tend to be emotional. Therefore, a good negotiation style should not hurt people's feelings. According to various studies, there are two effective types of negotiation, integrative and Distributive. The integrative is a win-win in which there is no loss to the involved parties. Such form of negotiation builds good long-term relationships and reduces chanc es of grudges in future. Distributive negotiations, on the other hand, are considered to be win-loss where one party losses to the other. Such form of negotiation, therefore, tends to be adversarial and competitive.Leaders need to be persistence in actions, which are likely to change and impact people positively. In my opinion, a leader needs to have clear goals and objective towards the organization they are leading. Personally, I implement any new changes that I believe that impact people positively and lead to the achievement of the intended goals of the organization. Besides, I involve my subjects in decision making and other management activities. Leaders should, therefore, be willing to share management roles with other people and also be responsible for every action they take.Leadership is directly influencing or coordinating activities of an organization or a group of people intending to meet the intended objections or goals (Griffin et al. 406). Good leaders are honest, tr ustworthy and positively influence people. Besides, such leaders involve their subjects in decision making, and they are always willing to take charge of every activity. They are also potential and have different capabilities which help in developing a vision. According to various experts, management and leadership are related but not the same. Managers establish structures and organize staffs where leaders align people and communicate directions. However, it is essential to p...